Re: PostgreSQL URI

From: Paul Förster <paul(dot)foerster(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-general list <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL URI
Date: 2021-02-26 18:02:11
Message-ID: 5EC34115-3585-4B05-838F-E9E918D9E8D6@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi Tom,

> On 26. Feb, 2021, at 17:13, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> WFM. Who's going to write the patch? (I can, but if one of you
> wants to, be my guest.)

as I said, I don't know how to write a patch. But I played around with diff & patch.

However, does this do when applied to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-connect.html? Would this be what is needed?

Attachment Content-Type Size
libpq-connect.patch application/octet-stream 958 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rumpi Gravenstein 2021-02-26 18:39:51 Re: PostgreSQL Licensing Question for pg_crypto and tablefunc extensions
Previous Message Michael Lewis 2021-02-26 17:45:59 Re: Batch update million records in prd DB