Re: Segmentation fault: pg_upgrade 9.1 to 9.3: pg_dump: row number 0 is out of range 0..-1

From: Alan Nilsson <anilsson(at)apple(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Nix <robert(at)urban4m(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault: pg_upgrade 9.1 to 9.3: pg_dump: row number 0 is out of range 0..-1
Date: 2013-10-27 05:51:12
Message-ID: 5EAA4CE7-EAC5-4C52-8C0B-801007AFB9CE@apple.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

oops sorry to be unclear, the code below is my code in my app.

What I am saying is that something changed in 90300 that causes libpq to spew to stdout where it had not in libpq 90102 & 90203.

I guess i am blaming the messenger because there should be no messenger. Regardless of how badly I mangle the use of libpq, it should not be sending anything to stdout.

alan

On Oct 26, 2013, at 6:53 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Alan Nilsson <anilsson(at)apple(dot)com> writes:
>> I ran into something tonight that seems relevant here, or certainly related:
>> I recently updated my app(s) libpq version from 9.1 to 9.3 and immediately I starting seeing:
>
>> row number 0 is out of range 0..-1
>
>> spewed to stdout.
>
>> I traced it down to this code:
>
>> if (PQresultStatus(result) == PGRES_TUPLES_OK){
>> if (!PQgetisnull(result, 0, 0)){
>> ......
>> }
>> }
>
> I can find no code like that in the PG sources --- everyplace that does
> "PQgetisnull(result, 0, 0)" prefaces it with a check that there's at least
> one row in the result. I think you're blaming the messenger.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert James 2013-10-27 13:04:42 Unique - first
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2013-10-26 14:28:40 Re: Replication and fsync