Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?
Date: 2024-06-12 20:10:01
Message-ID: 5E092D41-99CD-4BE6-9B3D-5E8EEA38C032@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 12, 2024, at 4:02 PM, David G. Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Adding Andrew.

Thank you.

> I'm willing to call this an open item against this feature as I don't see any documentation explaining that string() behaves differently than the others.

Maybe there’s some wording in the standard on this topic?

I’m happy to provide a patch to auto-unwrap .string() in lax mode. Seems pretty straightforward.

D

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2024-06-12 20:11:35 Re: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm.
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2024-06-12 20:02:44 Re: Shouldn't jsonpath .string() Unwrap?