Re: Simple SQL INSERT to avoid duplication failed: why?

From: Steven Schlansker <steven(at)likeness(dot)com>
To: "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>
Cc: "'Merlin Moncure'" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simple SQL INSERT to avoid duplication failed: why?
Date: 2013-05-01 16:48:56
Message-ID: 5DAAC605-49B8-48B2-8E82-AAD2B0241A68@likeness.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On May 1, 2013, at 9:36 AM, "Carlo Stonebanks" <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca> wrote:
> I have to ask myself, is it more likely that I have discovered some PG
> anomaly in 9.0 that no one has ever noticed, or that the client has
> accidentally launched the process twice and doesn't know it?

Given my (admittedly limited) experience with the PostgreSQL project and
dealing with clients, the latter ;-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jerry Sievers 2013-05-01 17:30:48 Re: Save postgresql node to catch only DML except delete queries
Previous Message Christophe Pettus 2013-05-01 16:40:34 Re: OK to put temp tablespace on volatile storage or to omit it from backups?