[PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function.

From: "R, Rajesh (STSD)" <rajesh(dot)r2(at)hp(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: [PATCH] Better way to check for getaddrinfo function.
Date: 2006-01-16 13:57:26
Message-ID: 5CBFB210D9870F40B9E5A0FBD31F3A77032F703F@bgeexc01.asiapacific.cpqcorp.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


Just thought that the following patch might improve checking for
getaddrinfo function (in configure.in)
I was forced to write 'coz getaddrinfo went unnoticed in Tru64 Unix.

(displaying attached patch)

$ diff -r configure.in configure.in.1
920c920,944
< AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo])
---
> AC_CACHE_CHECK([for getaddrinfo], ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo,
> [AC_TRY_LINK([#include <netdb.h>],
> [struct addrinfo *g,h;g=&h;getaddrinfo("","",g,&g);],
> AC_TRY_RUN([
> #include <assert.h>
> #include <netdb.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #ifndef AF_INET
> # include <sys/socket.h>
> #endif
> #ifdef __cplusplus
> extern "C"
> #endif
> char (*f) ();
> int main(void) {
>
> f = getaddrinfo;
>
> return 0;
> }
> ],ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo=yes, ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo=no),
> ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo=no)])
> if test "$ac_cv_func_getaddrinfo" = yes; then
> AC_DEFINE(HAVE_GETADDRINFO,1,[Define if you have the getaddrinfo
function])
> fi

Rajesh R
--
This space intentionally left non-blank.
<<configure-in.patch>>

Attachment Content-Type Size
configure-in.patch application/octet-stream 775 bytes

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Caduto 2006-01-16 14:01:08 Re: visual query builder for Postgres?
Previous Message Mikael Carneholm 2006-01-16 12:49:20 Re: Plans for 8.2?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-01-16 13:57:53 Re: source documentation tool doxygen
Previous Message Kim Bisgaard 2006-01-16 12:44:50 Re: source documentation tool doxygen