Re: House style for DocBook documentation?

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Markus Winand <markus(dot)winand(at)winand(dot)at>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
Date: 2019-03-08 04:04:07
Message-ID: 5C81E9B7.1050909@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/15/19 11:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote:
>>> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the
>>>
>>> o Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output
>>>
>>> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and
>>> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without
>>> hesitation?
>
> Committed that change.

I only now noticed that probably this should also have been changed:

-o If you want to supply text, use <link>, else <xref>
+o If you want to supply text, use <link> or <ulink>, else <xref>

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-03-08 04:22:54 Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participate in comparisons
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-03-08 02:44:36 Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards