Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
Date: 2019-03-05 09:28:07
Message-ID: 5C7E4127.2030802@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2019/03/01 20:16), Antonin Houska wrote:
> Etsuro Fujita<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:

>> Conversely, it appears that add_foreign_ordered_paths() added by the patchset
>> would generate such pre-sorted paths *redundantly* when the input_rel is the
>> final scan/join relation. Will look into that.
>
> Currently I have no idea how to check the plan created by FDW at the
> UPPERREL_ORDERED stage, except for removing the sort from the
> UPPERREL_GROUP_AGG stage as I proposed here:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11807.1549564431%40localhost

I don't understand your words "how to check the plan created by FDW".
Could you elaborate on that a bit more?

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2019-03-05 09:34:43 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message David Rowley 2019-03-05 09:22:26 Re: NOT IN subquery optimization