From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2010-01-21 17:35:41 |
Message-ID: | 5C301999-51EF-4639-90BE-1886C3A6DFD5@kineticode.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 21, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> As far as I can see, there is absolutely zero reason to care about
> whether the product is called Postgres or PostgreSQL.
How about simply "Post"? Or just "SQL"? ;-P
> If it were
> called WeGrindUpTheBonesOfSmallChildrenSQL, maybe a change would be
> worth considering.
And where do you think baby powder comes from? Sheesh.
> As it is, I submit that the product name is not on
> in the top 10,000 things we should be worried about fixing, even if
> there were a consensus that it were a good idea (which there isn't)
> and even if -core had not already made a decision on this point (which
> they have). What I think we SHOULD be worrying about right now is
> getting 9.0 out the door, and I am 100% opposed to letting ourselves
> getting sucked into this or any other discussion which is likely to
> make that take longer than it likely already will.
+1
David
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2010-01-21 19:00:12 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-21 17:19:42 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-01-21 17:42:58 | Re: GUC failure on exception |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-21 17:33:35 | Re: quoting psql varible as identifier |