| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgres_fdw: oddity in costing aggregate pushdown paths |
| Date: | 2018-12-03 11:20:32 |
| Message-ID: | 5C051180.7090804@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/11/30 18:51), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2018/11/28 13:38), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> BTW another thing I noticed is this comment on costing aggregate
>> pushdown paths using local statistics in estimate_path_cost_size:
>>
>> * Also, core does not care about costing HAVING expressions and
>> * adding that to the costs. So similarly, here too we are not
>> * considering remote and local conditions for costing.
>>
>> I think this was true when aggregate pushdown went in, but isn't anymore
>> because of commit 7b6c07547190f056b0464098bb5a2247129d7aa2. So we
>> should update estimate_path_cost_size so that it accounts for the
>> selectivity and cost of the HAVING expressions as well?
>
> There seems to be no objections, I updated the patch as such. Attached
> is an updated version of the patch.
I revised some comments a bit and added the commit message. Attached is
an updated patch. If there are no objections, I'll apply this to HEAD only.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| postgres-fdw-aggregate-pushdown-costsize-3.patch | text/x-patch | 6.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2018-12-03 11:38:43 | Re: Reviving the "Stopping logical replication protocol" patch from Vladimir Gordichuk |
| Previous Message | Tatsuro Yamada | 2018-12-03 09:22:20 | Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor |