Re: FW: Duplicate oids!

From: Steve King <steve(dot)king(at)ecmsys(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: Duplicate oids!
Date: 2002-12-16 10:56:39
Message-ID: 5B5F2A89A44ED5118A790090274DD8462AB64F@SNOOPY
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've now got a copy of pg_filedump and compiled it, can you tell me the
command line parameters to pass it (and the file that I must process) so I
can give you exactly what you require.

Thanks
Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: 13 December 2002 14:43
To: Steve King
Cc: 'Hannu Krosing'; 'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: Duplicate oids!

Steve King <steve(dot)king(at)ecmsys(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> The ctids are different however vaccum is run on this table and the record
> is updated.

It would be useful to look at xmin,xmax,cmin,cmax of these tuples too.

Actually, if you don't mind grabbing a copy of pg_filedump --- see
http://sources.redhat.com/rhdb/tools.html --- then a dump of page 7
of that relation would be good to look at. I am wondering about the
states of the infomask bits for these tuples...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Copeland 2002-12-16 13:56:25 Re: Big 7.4 items
Previous Message Manfred Koizar 2002-12-16 08:58:55 Re: PageGetMaxOffsetNumber