| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Date: | 2006-11-17 14:12:05 |
| Message-ID: | 5B31FAA2CF3E7D35E2574915@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Friday, November 17, 2006 15:03:00 +0100 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Certainly you can doctor up endless exceptions, if you are prepared to
> speedily integrate the evolving list of mail servers that I choose to use.
Unless I've mis-read something, the above only applies if we went totally
strict and used -all ... as long as we used ?all, you wouldn't be affected at
all, since we'd be acknowledging that other hosts could send, but that we know
that *our* registered IPs (a / mx) *do* send ...
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFFXcM14QvfyHIvDvMRAjFDAJ9uIJuOSyo3sYuNp0xQ172DFZadugCeP6Y7
PWMv0TxKDQSf8OnY1tT4pNY=
=VkAm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2006-11-17 14:40:29 | Re: SPF Record ... |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2006-11-17 14:09:02 | Re: SPF Record ... |