Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions
Date: 2018-05-02 06:45:09
Message-ID: 5AE95E75.1060100@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2018/05/02 10:10), Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2018/05/02 6:09, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2018-05-01 13:41:32 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Committed.
>
> Thank you.

Thanks for committing, Robert!

>> There's still an open items entry for this thread - has that been
>> resolved by this commit
>
> Afaik, yes. So moved that to resolved items.

Yeah, thanks for that, Amit!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yura Sokolov 2018-05-02 07:38:00 Re: [HACKERS] Clock with Adaptive Replacement
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-05-02 06:26:58 Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported