| From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions |
| Date: | 2018-04-26 03:47:04 |
| Message-ID: | 5AE14BB8.5090009@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2018/04/26 2:59), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I tried to do that. So, attached are two patches.
>>
>> 1. Fix for ExecInitPartitionInfo to use the right RT index to pass to
>> InitResultRelInfo
>>
>> 2. v5 of the patch to fix the bug of foreign partitions
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Are you splitting this into 2 patches here because there are 2
> separate issues? If so, what are those issues? There seem to be a
> bunch of interrelated changes here but I haven't seen a clear
> explanation of which ones are needed for which reasons.
As I said in an earlier email, I'm wondering if it would be better to
leave that for another patch for PG12.
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-04-26 04:01:03 | Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables are not supported |
| Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2018-04-26 03:43:17 | Re: Oddity in tuple routing for foreign partitions |