Re: Why the difference in plans ?

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why the difference in plans ?
Date: 2008-03-07 11:21:03
Message-ID: 5AA2522A-E359-4BA2-871C-5C5EA718F31F@fastcrypt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh,

On 6-Mar-08, at 12:26 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Dave,
>
>> Below I have two almost identical queries. Strangely enough the one
>> that uses the index is slower ???
>
> My first guess would be that records are highly correlated by DOB
> and not at
> all by name. However, it would help if you supplied both the index
> definitions and what changed between the two queries to cause the
> index to be
> used.

Indexes:
"user_profile_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (uid) CLUSTER
"user_profile_name_idx" UNIQUE, btree (name varchar_pattern_ops)
"user_profile_name_key" UNIQUE, btree (name)
"user_profile_uploadcode_key" UNIQUE, btree (uploadcode)
"user_profile_active_idx" btree (isactive)
"user_profile_areacode_index" btree (areacode)
"user_profile_gender_idx" btree (gender)

and nothing changed between runs.

Dave
>
>
> --
> Josh Berkus
> PostgreSQL @ Sun
> San Francisco
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
> )
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://mail.postgresql.org/mj/mj_wwwusr?domain=postgresql.org&extra=pgsql-performance

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2008-03-07 11:21:56 Re: Why the difference in plans ?
Previous Message Pavel Rotek 2008-03-07 09:29:33 Re: Toast space grows