| From: | John Gage <jsmgage(at)numericable(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Yang Zhang <yanghatespam(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sorting performance vs. MySQL |
| Date: | 2010-02-23 09:22:21 |
| Message-ID: | 5A438B61-B517-41B8-BF81-685884782335@numericable.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I am under the impression that MySQL does not have anything resembling
Postgres' support for regular expressions. Though some might think
that regular expressions are a sort of poor man's SQL, in any
application which manages large amounts of text they are crucial.
Postgres definitely does not suck.
Is this the authoratative webpage for "Snowball" (which I never
realized was a play on "Snobol")?
Thanks,
John
On Feb 23, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Yang Zhang wrote:
> I'm relieved that Postgresql itself does not, in fact, suck,
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yan Cheng CHEOK | 2010-02-23 09:26:33 | Alternative to UPDATE (As COPY to INSERT) |
| Previous Message | Net Tree Inc. | 2010-02-23 09:17:30 | Re: how do I do dump and restore without bugging with constraint? |