From: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable |
Date: | 2017-11-28 05:03:37 |
Message-ID: | 5A1CEE29.50800@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2017/11/28 11:18), Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Ryan Murphy<ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
>
> This status is misleading, so I switched it back to "needs review"
> (please be careful about that!).
I think I forgot to change that status. Sorry about that.
> I can still apply the patch
> correctly. Sorry I am not taking the time to have a meaningful opinion
> about this patch. The patch passes all regression tests. As I am on
> this entry, I am bumping the patch to next CF..
Ok, thanks!
Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2017-11-28 05:39:07 | Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2017-11-28 04:38:29 | Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions |