Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ryan Murphy <ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Useless code in ExecInitModifyTable
Date: 2017-11-28 05:03:37
Message-ID: 5A1CEE29.50800@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2017/11/28 11:18), Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Ryan Murphy<ryanfmurphy(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
>
> This status is misleading, so I switched it back to "needs review"
> (please be careful about that!).

I think I forgot to change that status. Sorry about that.

> I can still apply the patch
> correctly. Sorry I am not taking the time to have a meaningful opinion
> about this patch. The patch passes all regression tests. As I am on
> this entry, I am bumping the patch to next CF..

Ok, thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabien COELHO 2017-11-28 05:39:07 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts
Previous Message David Fetter 2017-11-28 04:38:29 Re: Add RANGE with values and exclusions clauses to the Window Functions