From: | Henrik <henke(at)mac(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bill Moran" <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Database growing. Need autovacuum help. |
Date: | 2008-06-05 07:35:58 |
Message-ID: | 5A0C823B-4E9E-4EE2-8264-A6C01363F6B0@mac.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
3 jun 2008 kl. 16.06 skrev Scott Marlowe:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Henrik <henke(at)mac(dot)se> wrote:
>>
>> To be able to handle versions we always insert new folders even
>> though
>> nothing has changed but it seemd like the best way to do it.
>>
>> E.g
>>
>> First run:
>> tbl_file 500k new files.
>> tbl_folder 50k new rows.
>> tbl_file_folder 550k new rows.
>>
>> Second run with no new files.
>> tbl_file unchanged.
>> tbl_folder 50k new rows
>> tbl_file_folder 550k new rows.
>
> On useful trick is to include a where clause that prevents the extra
> updates.
>
> I.e. update table set field=123 where field <> 123;
Mmm I keep that in mind. The problem is that on these tables I only do
INSERTS and DELETES. :)
Maybe I can redesign it but I can find a good way...yet...
Thanks!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2008-06-05 09:03:41 | Re: Tripping up on my first attempt at building PG from source |
Previous Message | Henrik | 2008-06-05 07:32:42 | Re: Strange statistics |