From: | Christopher Petrilli <petrilli(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Tomeh, Husam" <htomeh(at)firstam(dot)com>, PgSQL ADMIN <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate! |
Date: | 2005-01-13 00:27:51 |
Message-ID: | 59d991c405011216274c899584@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 01:00:31 +0100, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Tomeh, Husam wrote:
> > I've seen book that prefer installing PostgreSQL as root and another
> > one recommends otherwise by first creating a postgres account and
> > then installing it as postgres. In the Oracle world, you don't use
> > root to install the software. What is the best practice as far as
> > PostgreSQL goes?
>
> The current recommendation, which is reflected in the installation
> instructions, is to install the software as root and to use the
> postgres user for the database files. The advice seen elsewhere in
> this thread to use the postgres user also for the software files is
> wrong.
As a security professional, why would the root user need to be
involved in the ownership of PostgreSQL? I see no reason for this,
but perhaps I'm missing something important.
Chris
--
| Christopher Petrilli
| petrilli(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-01-13 00:31:51 | Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate! |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2005-01-13 00:00:31 | Re: Installing PostgreSQL as "postgress" versus "root" Debate! |