Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Date: 2018-05-14 01:20:06
Message-ID: 59aea89a-52fe-7698-a3fb-55441922dc36@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018/05/14 9:55, David Rowley wrote:
> On 13 May 2018 at 03:30, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Amit Langote wrote:
>>
>>> +1 to this more radical overhaul of this part of the documentation.
>>
>> Thanks. I pushed now after some more tweaking,
>
> Thanks for pushing.

Thank you.

Regards,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-05-14 02:50:34 Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-05-14 00:55:59 Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?