| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joshua Brindle <joshua(dot)brindle(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pierre Ducroquet <p(dot)psql(at)pinaraf(dot)info>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications |
| Date: | 2019-02-28 17:35:53 |
| Message-ID: | 59a90e76-bf09-9fce-7f66-93a389197e6a@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/28/19 12:28 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Mmmph. If your customers always have a non-production instance where
> problems from production can be easily reproduced, your customers are
> not much like our customers.
Well I certainly did not mean to imply that this is always the case ;-)
But I think it is fair to tell customers that have these tradeoffs in
front of them that it would be even more wise in the case they decided
to use this capability.
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-02-28 17:36:50 | Re: Drop type "smgr"? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-02-28 17:28:38 | Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications |