From: | Rodrigo E(dot) De León Plicet <rdeleonp(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Don't Thread On Me (PostgreSQL related) |
Date: | 2012-01-26 21:52:48 |
Message-ID: | 59a05193-62f0-4e97-9b4c-d7b903c7674d@b20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Quote:
======================================================================
This thread
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Multithread-Query-Planner-td5143643.html
was mentioned in a performance sub-group posting. Give it a read.
Back? It means, so far as I can see, that PG is toast. It will fall
down to being the cheap and dirty alternative to MySql, which even
has, at least two, multi-threaded engines. DB2 switched it's *nix
engine to threads from processes with release 9.5. Oracle claims it
for releases going back to 7 (I haven't tried to determine which parts
or applications; Larry has bought so many tchochtkes over the
years...). SQL Server is threaded.
Given that cpu's are breeding threads faster than cores,
PG will fall into irrelevance.
======================================================================
Source:
http://drcoddwasright.blogspot.com/2012/01/dont-thread-on-me.html
Comments?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2012-01-26 22:05:43 | Preventing access temporarily. |
Previous Message | Chris Angelico | 2012-01-26 21:10:11 | Re: Best way to create unique primary keys across schemas? |