Re: PostgreSQL misspellings in translations

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-translators(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL misspellings in translations
Date: 2019-05-28 20:41:18
Message-ID: 59E90A88-D61D-4936-A846-10EB1E690077@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-translators

> On 28 May 2019, at 16:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-May-28, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>
>> Spotted two misspellings of PostgreSQL in the translations as per the attached
>> patch.
>
> FTR, any translation entry prefixed with #~ corresponds to an obsolete
> one, that is, a string that once was a valid message in the catalog and
> was translated in that catalog, but isn't a valid message anymore. It
> would be picked up by the fuzzy matcher if the string is revived in the
> code, but I wouldn't normally bother trying to get a fix for it
> committed. If anything, I would remove all #~ entries from the catalog
> files once in a while …

Ah, right. I reacted to it since it was committed only recently.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-translators by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-06-04 21:34:08 Re: Translation updates for zh_CN.po (Chinese Simplified)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2019-05-28 20:36:55 Re: PostgreSQL misspellings in translations