Re: pg_class.relistemp

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_class.relistemp
Date: 2011-07-14 21:48:36
Message-ID: 59B8FFAE-B6DD-45C8-90D0-79BDFAF0299C@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 14, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Dave Page wrote:

> Break compatibility is actually something that is important to us - it
> forces us to fix obvious issues, and makes it much harder to
> inadvertently miss important changes.

Agreed, but a deprecation cycle would be much appreciated.

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-07-14 21:51:26 Re: Is there a committer in the house?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-07-14 21:46:34 Re: Is there a committer in the house?