From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | Petr Jelínek <pjmodos(at)parba(dot)cz>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: limiting connections per user/database |
Date: | 2005-06-27 13:51:02 |
Message-ID: | 5986.1119880262@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> writes:
> - when we read in the stats collector's stats file in a normal backend,
> there will be no pgStatDBHash entry for the backend's database.
> Therefore we'll read the beentry for the backend, and when we go to
> increment the n_backends for the corresponding dbentry, there will be no
> dbentry found (HASH_FIND at pgstat.c:2554), so n_backends won't be updated.
> - therefore we won't count the n_backends for the database correctly.
However, this could equally be fixed by replacing the hash_search call
at l. 2554 by pgstat_get_db_entry(). If your definition of "correct"
is that "a new backend can see at least one backend in its own database"
then this would be a more appropriate fix anyway, since there's a lag
between sending BESTART and seeing any result in the collector's output.
This isn't an argument against moving the responsibility for counting
n_backends into the collector, but as long as it's done in
pgstat_read_statsfile the proposed fix is pretty bogus.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-06-27 13:53:23 | PL/Python error checking |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-27 13:49:54 | Re: regexp_replace |