From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why does logical replication launcher set application_name? |
Date: | 2017-04-14 13:48:34 |
Message-ID: | 597b2322-4ff1-db85-bde0-bfbe9982f7a9@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/04/17 02:32, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 3:40 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> I notice looking at pg_stat_activity that the logical replication launcher
>>> sets its application_name to "logical replication launcher". This seems
>>> inconsistent (no other standard background process sets application_name),
>>> redundant with other columns that already tell you what it is, and an
>>> unreasonable consumption of horizontal space in the tabular output.
>>> Can we drop that? If we do have to have something like that, what about
>>> putting it in the "query" field where it's much less likely to be
>>> substantially wider than any other entry in the column?
>>
>> It seems to me that the logic behind that is to be able to identify
>> easily the logical replication launcher in pg_stat_activity, so using
>> the query field instead sounds fine for me as we need another way than
>> backend_type to guess what is this bgworker.
>
> Wait, why do we need two ways?
>
What do you mean by two ways? There is no way if we don't set anything.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-04-14 14:22:36 | Re: Should pg_current_wal_location() become pg_current_wal_lsn() |
Previous Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-04-14 13:33:45 | Re: logical replication and PANIC during shutdown checkpoint in publisher |