Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Would the "lock_timeout" work for all to be acquired locks individually,
> or all of them combined for the statement? The individual application
> of the timeout for every locks individually wouldn't be too nice.
I think the way you're describing would be both harder to implement
and full of its own strange traps.
regards, tom lane