| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Soma Interesting <dfunct(at)telus(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Overhead of tables. |
| Date: | 2000-12-06 04:48:37 |
| Message-ID: | 5972.976078117@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Soma Interesting <dfunct(at)telus(dot)net> writes:
> I'd like to get an idea of the overhead introduced by large quantity of
> tables being hosted off a single PostgreSQL server. It is possible I'll be
> wanting to host upwards of 200-500 tables per server. Essentially, will I
> be surprised to find out that performance in PostgreSQL (or DBMS in
> general) is significantly hindered by sheer quantity of tables?
When you get to tens of thousands of tables per server, we might start
to worry a little... 500 is in the "what me worry?" class.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-06 05:04:09 | Re: Many postmasters... |
| Previous Message | Mikheev, Vadim | 2000-12-06 04:24:50 | RE: How to reset WAL enveironment |