| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? |
| Date: | 2014-12-28 01:51:47 |
| Message-ID: | 5969.1419731507@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This would have the effect of transferring all responsibility for
>> dead-stats-entry cleanup to autovacuum. For ordinary users, I think
>> that'd be just fine. It might be less fine though for people who
>> disable autovacuum, if there still are any.
> -1. I don't think it's a good idea to inflict pain on people who want
> to schedule their vacuums manually (and yes, there are some) to get
> clean buildfarm runs.
Did you read the rest of it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-12-28 03:06:19 | Re: nls and server log |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-12-28 01:45:22 | Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? |