| From: | Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-pkg-yum <pgsql-pkg-yum(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New repo RPMs |
| Date: | 2019-04-16 21:32:04 |
| Message-ID: | 5962022b5684b766501819e4a0acfa8ee473831b.camel@gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-yum |
Hi Gabriele,
On Tue, 2019-04-16 at 14:20 +0200, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
> I have noticed that version 10 folder (
> https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/10/redhat/rhel-7-x86_64/)
> still contains the pgdg-redhat10 package, while the 11 one (
> https://download.postgresql.org/pub/repos/yum/11/redhat/rhel-7-x86_64/)
> doesn't. I see that version 9.6, 9.5 and 9.4 do have that file.
They are more consistent now -- main repo will pick them up in 1 hour.
> What is the expected behaviour? It is important to know if the file stays
> there or not, so that existing configuration managers or automation tools
> (I am thinking of Ansible playbooks) that are used to recreate systems from
> scratch are not impacted.
I just created symlinks to the previous repo RPMs. At least you won't get 404
(if you get, please let me know). I hope that will pour down some cold water
over the fire.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
Open Source Solution Architect, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim Gündüz | 2019-04-16 21:40:05 | Splitting libpq into a separate package |
| Previous Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2019-04-16 12:20:32 | Re: New repo RPMs |