From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | tmorelli(at)tmorelli(dot)com(dot)br |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: A question about pages. Still not clear |
Date: | 2006-01-12 17:21:38 |
Message-ID: | 5961.1137086498@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
tmorelli(at)tmorelli(dot)com(dot)br writes:
> Every insert was like this:
> insert into t values (repeat('a',8000));
> Obviously, there must be some kind of compression (the toast table is empty!).
Sure, that's highly compressible data ;-). I repeated your experiment
and then did VACUUM FULL VERBOSE, which provided me this information:
Nonremovable row versions range from 135 to 135 bytes long.
So 8000 'a's compress down into about a hundred bytes, plus the row
header overhead. (Your mileage may vary a bit depending on machine
architecture, PG version, etc.)
> Is there any way of knowing exactly WHEN there will be a new page allocation?
No. Why should you care?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lucius Seneca | 2006-01-12 17:52:01 | Re: [despammed] CSV Import? |
Previous Message | operationsengineer1 | 2006-01-12 17:08:59 | Sort of Complex Query - Howto Eliminate Repeating Results |