From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
Cc: | Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: lc_time and localized dates |
Date: | 2008-02-26 18:47:16 |
Message-ID: | 5946.1204051636@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> FYI, strftime() [1] doesn't say anything about capitalization. I don't
> know if some translators are aware of it and even if they are, how would
> they know that a day or month is the first word of a sentence? IMHO we
> should provide Xxxxx, xxxxx, and XXXXX so the programmer can use
> whatever he/she thinks is correct for him/her.
I think you've missed the point, which is that the programmer can't
possibly know in advance which capitalization is correct, if she's
trying to build a system that works for different localizations.
But as Peter remarks nearby, this discussion is wasted anyway, because
there is only one correct answer: whatever Oracle does with these
cases is what to_char() should do.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gevik Babakhani | 2008-02-26 18:53:42 | Re: lc_time and localized dates |
Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2008-02-26 18:18:06 | Re: lc_time and localized dates |