Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)
Date: 2014-04-18 00:57:20
Message-ID: 5938.1397782640@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On 04/17/2014 05:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> 1. The things that DISCARD ALL resets are explicitly enumerated in its
>> documentation page; it is not an open-ended promise to clean up anything
>> anybody happens to think of.

> Actually, it is. Unless we change the wording in the documentation

Well, we definitely need to tweak the short description of DISCARD ALL.
But the long description a bit further down the page is quite clear.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-04-18 01:04:22 Re: assertion failure 9.3.4
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2014-04-18 00:39:14 Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)