| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Remove non-fast promotion Re: Should we remove a fallback promotion? take 2 |
| Date: | 2020-04-23 02:34:45 |
| Message-ID: | 5936bac5-3dea-f9f9-7cd6-67c40ed22c3d@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/04/23 3:56, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:51:15 +0900
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On 2020/04/22 10:53, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>> [...]
>>
>> Thanks all for checking whether the change affects each HA solution!
>
> Unless I'm wrong, we don't have feedback from Patroni team.
>
> I did some quick grep and it seems to rely on "pg_ctl promote" as well.
> Moreover, the latest commit 80fbe9005 force a checkpoint right after the
> promote. So I suppose they don't use non-fast promote.
Thanks for checking that!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-04-23 02:36:57 | Re: Parallel Append can break run-time partition pruning |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-04-23 02:33:46 | Re: backup manifests |