From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, "Massa, Harald Armin" <chef(at)ghum(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
Date: | 2009-10-20 21:54:39 |
Message-ID: | 5923.1256075679@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> writes:
> I'd like a default, especially for psql, to help identify interactive sessions.
psql can certainly provide a default, and maybe even do something
actually useful like report the -f file it's running. The question here
is whether it is worth the trouble for libpq to try to report an appname
*without* the surrounding application's cooperation. I don't think so.
You are talking dozens if not hundreds of lines of unportable code,
versus one line (per app) of entirely portable code.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-20 21:59:07 | Re: Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly |
Previous Message | daveg | 2009-10-20 21:53:28 | Re: Postgres server goes in recovery mode repeteadly |