| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ssl file permission |
| Date: | 2020-09-26 18:38:50 |
| Message-ID: | 5922.1601145530@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Sorry. Execute permission for owner may have been on prior to chmod og-rwx . I thought that might be a problem and 600 eliminates that
It seems highly unlikely that openssl would write the file with x
permission turned on. Even if it did, there's no particular
reason for us to insist on changing it.
>> That said, it might be a good idea to be consistent since we seem to use a mix of different styles of chmod.
There is that. But I think the "og-rwx" style is more recommendable,
if we're going to try to standardize.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Westermann (DWE) | 2020-09-27 15:58:14 | Wrong example in the bloom documentation |
| Previous Message | Rob Sargent | 2020-09-26 15:54:59 | Re: ssl file permission |