Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Subject: Re: Out-of-memory error reports in libpq
Date: 2021-07-28 16:49:24
Message-ID: 591937.1627490964@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Is it worth making the first one a macro?

It'd be the same from a source-code perspective, but probably a
shade bulkier in terms of object code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2021-07-28 16:58:41 Re: CREATE SEQUENCE with RESTART option
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-07-28 16:39:42 Re: Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort