Re: Access Management question

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Access Management question
Date: 2017-05-30 21:20:22
Message-ID: 591863dc-11a2-4186-10b2-264cc523901d@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/30/2017 2:06 PM, chiru r wrote:
> Is there any reason, why it is showing roles name as owner of table
> instead of user?

'user' is a synonym for 'role' with login permission.

CREATE USER fred;

is exactly the same as...

CREATE ROLE fred WITH LOGIN;

when you SET ROLE rolename; its virtually the same as logging in as
rolename

> Why it is not allowed to GRANT SUPERUSER/CREATEDB etc roles Directly
> to user (using GRANT ,not ALTER USER) ?

GRANT is used to grant object related permissions or to grant role
membership, its not a 'role' nor do roles inherit special attributes
like SUPERUSER, CREATEDB.

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-30 21:23:59 Re: 9.5 "chained equality" behavior
Previous Message chiru r 2017-05-30 21:06:53 Access Management question