Re: On defining Perl functions within PLPERL code

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: On defining Perl functions within PLPERL code
Date: 2008-03-11 15:37:17
Message-ID: 59040ae3f7cfc1e3fc9bd8d871a3d5c3@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> I thought this claim needs further clarification, since the docs for PLPERL
> include a warning that may give readers the impression that defining Perl
> functions within PLPERL code is somehow problematic. This warning says:

Well, it /is/ problematic, especially for those that don't know Perl well,
but doc patches are welcome. :)

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200803111136
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkfWpxIACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjG8ACgtm/KDquzv8kz0D3Ij4jHJvIG
HNgAoNS5sBTDfXjINj4TEsZdlEAi7mhM
=7pgP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-03-11 15:40:34 Re: Database OID xxxxx now seems to belong to "foo"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-11 15:31:53 Re: Database OID xxxxx now seems to belong to "foo"