Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)

From: Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajay Pal <ajay(dot)pal(dot)k(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
Date: 2024-12-21 21:45:25
Message-ID: 589d56c7-4e43-4feb-8f94-244dd03ff816@proxel.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/29/24 8:55 PM, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> I especially dislike the static variable in our patch. And as far as I
> understand it you can avoid the static by changing the lexer to use the
> push parser so it can emit multiple terminal tokens from one parsed
> token, but I have not looked into push parsers and have no idea how this
> would affect performance.

Updated the patch to remove the static variable. No clue why I thought
that one was necessary.

Andreas

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Broken-out-tokeniziation-of-arrows.patch text/x-patch 10.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2024-12-21 22:12:55 Re: TransactionXmin != MyProc->xmin
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2024-12-21 20:27:54 PoC: history of recent vacuum/checkpoint runs (using new hooks)