Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Beta for 4:30AST ... ?
Date: 2000-02-21 15:41:53
Message-ID: 5899.951147713@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Not having heard anything otherwise, assume we can go Beta today, as
> planned?

Might as well --- we have open issues, but there'll always be open
issues. I don't think anyone is still hoping to shoehorn new features
into 7.0, just bug fixes. (Wait, does a unary-minus operator for
numeric count as a new feature ;-) ?)

I do suggest that we had better commit the current state of the rules
regress test output as the expected output, so that we don't have a
lot of confused beta-testers. An actual fix will have to wait for
Thomas to return, but I don't think we want to put off going to beta
just because he's on vacation.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adam Walczykiewicz 2000-02-21 15:44:33 ShmemCreate: cannot create reg
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-21 13:45:35 Beta for 4:30AST ... ?