Re: strange estimate for number of rows

Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> The statistics on transaction_date and product_id are set to 1000.
> Everything is all analysed nicely. But I'm getting a poor plan,
> because of an estimate that the number of rows to be returned is
> about double how many actually are:

> explain analyse select * from transactions_posted where
> transaction_date >= '2003-9-1' and transaction_date < '2003-10-1' and
> product_id = 2;

Are the estimates accurate for queries on the two columns individually,
ie
... where transaction_date >= '2003-9-1' and transaction_date < '2003-10-1'
... where product_id = 2

If so, the problem is that there's a correlation between
transaction_date and product_id, which the system cannot model because
it has no multi-column statistics.

However, given that the estimate is only off by about a factor of 2,
you'd still be getting the wrong plan even if the estimate were perfect,
because the estimated costs differ by nearly a factor of 3.

Given the actual runtimes, I'm thinking maybe you want to reduce
random_page_cost. What are you using for that now?

regards, tom lane