Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results!

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results!
Date: 1998-08-18 19:09:06
Message-ID: 5880.903467346@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 18 Aug 1998, David Hartwig wrote:
>> I just started compiling the 6.4 snapshot from this weekend on our AIX 4.1.4
>> system. I am running into problems surrounding snprintf().
>>
>> 1. Do I need to set something in Makefile.global to activate the
>> compilation of snprintf()

Ah ... it's a typo in configure.in.

AC_CHECK_FUNC(snprintf,
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SNPRINTF),
ISINF='snprintf.o')
AC_SUBST(SNPRINTF)

should read

AC_CHECK_FUNC(snprintf,
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SNPRINTF),
SNPRINTF='snprintf.o')
AC_SUBST(SNPRINTF)

Looks like this has never worked, which makes me wonder how well
debugged our snprintf emulation is ... I guess David will test it
out for us ...

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 1998-08-18 19:27:57 weird problem with latest cvs
Previous Message Jackson, DeJuan 1998-08-18 18:53:34 RE: [HACKERS] sequence creation