Re: -D option of pg_resetwal is only works with absolute path

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: -D option of pg_resetwal is only works with absolute path
Date: 2018-05-23 15:35:29
Message-ID: 5877.1527089729@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
> On 5/23/18 10:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Seems to be caused by careless placement of new umask-changing code.
>> I wonder how many other places that patch broke similarly.

> I'll look into this today.

I pushed a patch already, although certainly an additional pair of eyes
on the issue would be good.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Steele 2018-05-23 15:40:48 Re: -D option of pg_resetwal is only works with absolute path
Previous Message David Steele 2018-05-23 15:34:19 Re: -D option of pg_resetwal is only works with absolute path