Re: Online enabling of checksums

From: Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Online enabling of checksums
Date: 2018-08-01 10:16:58
Message-ID: 5866421533118618@myt4-7b9f23a5698b.qloud-c.yandex.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello
I think one restart is acceptable for such feature. I doubt user want often disable-enable checksums. In many cases checksums will be enabled one time during all cluster life. We need more downtimes for minor updates (4/year) and changes in config PGC_POSTMASTER (max_connections or autovacuum workers, for example).

regards, Sergei

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-08-01 10:49:21 Re: [Patch] Checksums for SLRU files
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2018-08-01 09:55:53 Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for PostgreSQL