From: | Sergei Kornilov <sk(at)zsrv(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
Date: | 2018-08-01 10:16:58 |
Message-ID: | 5866421533118618@myt4-7b9f23a5698b.qloud-c.yandex.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
I think one restart is acceptable for such feature. I doubt user want often disable-enable checksums. In many cases checksums will be enabled one time during all cluster life. We need more downtimes for minor updates (4/year) and changes in config PGC_POSTMASTER (max_connections or autovacuum workers, for example).
regards, Sergei
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-08-01 10:49:21 | Re: [Patch] Checksums for SLRU files |
Previous Message | Emre Hasegeli | 2018-08-01 09:55:53 | Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for PostgreSQL |