| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | egcs experimentation results |
| Date: | 1999-05-30 15:47:15 |
| Message-ID: | 5857.928079235@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
For work-related reasons I recently had to install egcs 1.1.2 here.
I thought I'd try Postgres with it, since we have at least two reports
of problems seen only with egcs:
1. The business about char and short parameters to functions
called through fmgr;
2. Oleg's report of instability seen only with egcs and -O.
The upshot is that I found a few minor glitches in the configure
script, and cleaned up two or three insignificant warnings that
egcs generates but gcc doesn't. I was *not* able to duplicate
any instability using either -O2 or -O3. The regression tests all
pass, and Oleg's fifteen-way join test is happy too.
This is on an HP-PA box, which is not the same as the PowerPC that
problem #1 was reported on, but is likewise a RISC architecture.
So I was hopeful I would see that problem here.
So, now what? From talking to Bruce off-list, I know that he's not
eager to make changes as extensive as problem #1 appears to require
on the strength of just one unconfirmed trouble report. I think I
have to agree...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 1999-05-30 18:46:31 | Re: [HACKERS] egcs experimentation results |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-05-30 15:02:28 | Re: [HACKERS] Daemon News article |