| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "Andrew Dunstan *EXTERN*" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: IDLE in transaction introspection |
| Date: | 2011-11-04 13:42:02 |
| Message-ID: | 5843.1320414122@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org> writes:
> While we're already breaking everything, we could remove the "waiting"
> column and use a state with value 'waiting' instead.
-1 ... I think it's useful to see the underlying state as well as the
waiting flag. Also, this would represent breakage of part of the API
that doesn't need to be broken.
> Also, returning these as text seems a little lame. Should there be an
> enum type for that?
Perhaps, but we don't really use enum types in any other system views,
so inventing one here would be out of character.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-11-04 13:45:06 | Re: Show sequences owned by |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-11-04 13:34:05 | Show statistics target in \d+ |