From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Cc: | "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Jesse Zhang <sbjesse(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Date: | 2023-04-22 11:42:36 |
Message-ID: | 582c503b-cd98-1891-ff87-9c8e8ce73ee5@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2023-04-22 Sa 04:50, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 09:58:17AM +0200, Jelte Fennema wrote:
>> For 2 the upstream thread listed two approaches:
>> a. Install a pre-receive git hook on the git server that rejects
>> pushes to master that are not indented
>> b. Add a test suite that checks if the code is correctly indented, so
>> the build farm would complain about it. (Suggested by Peter E)
>>
>> I think both a and b would work to achieve 2. But as Peter E said, b
>> indeed sounds like less of a divergence of the status quo. So my vote
>> would be for b.
> FWIW, I think that there is value for both of them. Anyway, isn't 'a'
> exactly the same as 'b' in design? Both require a build of
> pg_bsd_indent, meaning that 'a' would also need to run an equivalent
> of the regression test suite, but it would be actually costly
> especially if pg_bsd_indent itself is patched. I think that getting
> more noisy on this matter with 'b' would be enough, but as an extra
> PG_TEST_EXTRA for committers to set.
>
> Such a test suite would need a dependency to the 'git' command itself,
> which is not something that could be safely run in a release tarball,
> in any case.
Perhaps we should start with a buildfarm module, which would run
pg_indent --show-diff. That would only need to run on one animal, so a
failure wouldn't send the whole buildfarm red. This would be pretty easy
to do.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB:https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-04-22 12:10:18 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-04-22 11:06:02 | Re: Logging parallel worker draught |