Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@

From: "Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
Date: 2019-08-07 20:02:59
Message-ID: 581567E7-FF5A-423A-963F-9AD421CC4222@amazon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

I'm on-board with that color of paint for the shed. (FWIW, I'm not actually opposed to -extensions either; worst-case we split that list later if needed.)

On 8/7/19, 5:08 AM, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

I'm personally not opposed to pgsql-forks, but I see that this name
could be contentious. How about something like pgsql-derived-hackers?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2019-08-08 01:51:40 Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-08-07 10:08:16 Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@