Re: Typos in the code and README

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Typos in the code and README
Date: 2025-01-01 16:00:01
Message-ID: 5812a0b9-b0cf-4151-9a14-d9f00e4f2858@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello hackers,

03.09.2024 08:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And done that.

Please look at another collection of typos and inconsistencies introduced
during 2024:
behvior -> behavior

contraint -> constraint

curent -> current

disable_node -> disabled_nodes

disabled_node > disabled_nodes

disable_nodes -> disabled_nodes

FindFkPeriodOpers -> FindFKPeriodOpers

heap_inplace_update -> heap_inplace_update_and_unlock

InitLocks -> LockManagerShmemInit? (see fbce7dfc7)

isReadOnly -> IsReadOnly

negotations -> negotiations

notnull_inh -> notnull_islocal (coined by 14e87ffa5)

num_word -> just remove an old-fashioned comment? or change to
 append_num_word (see 5bf948d56)

objectAddress -> ObjectAddress

orderProc -> orderProcs

pg_visibilitymap.c -> visibilitymap.c

postitional_fcinfo -> positional_fcinfo

preserve_formatting -> preserve_comments (see 995e0fbc1)

procesess -> processes

trapper -> trapped

trasformed -> transformed

vac_update_datfrozenid -> vac_update_datfrozenxid

XLPH_HAS_* -> XLHP_HAS_*

XLogRecordInsert -> XLogInsertRecord (coined by afd12774a)

Please find attached the corresponding patch for your convenience.

Best regards,
Alexander

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix-typos-inconsistencies-2024.patch text/x-patch 12.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michail Nikolaev 2025-01-01 16:16:00 Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Previous Message Michail Nikolaev 2025-01-01 14:58:11 Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)