From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Subject: | Re: Typos in the code and README |
Date: | 2025-01-01 16:00:01 |
Message-ID: | 5812a0b9-b0cf-4151-9a14-d9f00e4f2858@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello hackers,
03.09.2024 08:51, Michael Paquier wrote:
> And done that.
Please look at another collection of typos and inconsistencies introduced
during 2024:
behvior -> behavior
contraint -> constraint
curent -> current
disable_node -> disabled_nodes
disabled_node > disabled_nodes
disable_nodes -> disabled_nodes
FindFkPeriodOpers -> FindFKPeriodOpers
heap_inplace_update -> heap_inplace_update_and_unlock
InitLocks -> LockManagerShmemInit? (see fbce7dfc7)
isReadOnly -> IsReadOnly
negotations -> negotiations
notnull_inh -> notnull_islocal (coined by 14e87ffa5)
num_word -> just remove an old-fashioned comment? or change to
append_num_word (see 5bf948d56)
objectAddress -> ObjectAddress
orderProc -> orderProcs
pg_visibilitymap.c -> visibilitymap.c
postitional_fcinfo -> positional_fcinfo
preserve_formatting -> preserve_comments (see 995e0fbc1)
procesess -> processes
trapper -> trapped
trasformed -> transformed
vac_update_datfrozenid -> vac_update_datfrozenxid
XLPH_HAS_* -> XLHP_HAS_*
XLogRecordInsert -> XLogInsertRecord (coined by afd12774a)
Please find attached the corresponding patch for your convenience.
Best regards,
Alexander
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
fix-typos-inconsistencies-2024.patch | text/x-patch | 12.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michail Nikolaev | 2025-01-01 16:16:00 | Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements |
Previous Message | Michail Nikolaev | 2025-01-01 14:58:11 | Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch) |