From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade |
Date: | 2021-10-29 03:19:56 |
Message-ID: | 581193.1635477596@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> Did that work? Commit 7f580aa should make this unnecessary for v12+
> contrib/amcheck tests, but older branches still need a fix, and 017_shm.pl
> needs a fix in all branches. A backup plan is just to skip affected tests on
> dragonfly 6+. Since the breakage has been limited to so few tests, I'm
> optimistic that a better workaround will present itself.
It indeed is looking like 7f580aa made the problem go away on conchuela,
but do we understand why? The only theory I can think of is "kernel bug",
but while that's plausible for prairiedog it seems hard to credit for a
late-model BSD kernel.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2021-10-29 03:42:31 | Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2021-10-29 02:56:00 | Re: conchuela timeouts since 2021-10-09 system upgrade |